![]() ![]() Then, as Shaun mentioned, you get a place in the code where you need to check if the user's password matches the VI's password in order to show the BD and if you patch the LV executable to override that check - voila. That means that the code itself can't be encrypted. ![]() Since the user can't be expected to provide the passwords (since, for instance, some of the VIs in the hierarchy were written by someone else) LV needs to be able to read the code even without the password. The reason for this is simple - LV needs to access the source code in order to compile it to machine code. I checked in 2009 and 8.6.1 - with no luck too.Īctually, I can confirm that the basic concept does apply in 2009 and probably in later versions as well. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |